How You Can Stop Taxgate And End Extraterritorial Taxation, Reporting, And Exit Taxes

Here is how you can fight back against the crimes against humanity explained in Taxgate Part One. The usual disclaimers apply and this is not legal advice and you should definitely seek it out before trying to implement any of these steps. This also builds upon our earlier playbook for fighting back against crimes against humanity.

There are several ways to fight back against this. First you can challenge the taxation and reporting requirements in the courts of the country trying to deem you tax resident. Then you can challenge it in the countries where you live and/or where your assets are. You can also seek damages, reparations, and financial compensation, but that depends on a lot of factors that are specific to your situation so that won’t be addressed in this general guide. The other big thing you can do is crimes against humanity prosecutions through universal jurisdiction.

To prosecute Taxgate crimes against humanity using universal jurisdiction you can just find out how to work within the country’s legal system in order to do that anywhere, since universal jurisdiction allows the prosecutions to be brought anywhere.

Challenges should include every aspect and dimension of Taxgate. Focus on stopping the taxation and any reporting requirements, FATCA and CRS, tax information exchange agreements, enforcement, and any other actions taken by tax authorities or countries against you.

A hypothetical situation could be a person who lives in Canada has their money in the UK, and who Australia is trying to tax. The person would sue in Canadian and UK courts to stop them from working with Australia and to stop CRS and other data sharing. They would sue in Australia to stop the extraterritorial taxation and to stop any reporting requirements they may have. They’d also seek in their UK court lawsuit to stop cooperation with Canada as well since Canada engages in extraterritorial taxation and exit taxes. If that person were trying to leave Australia or Canada they might have to sue to block the exit taxes and sue in the UK to block cooperation with Canada and Australia. The person could also go to as many countries as possible and try to start as many crimes against humanity prosecutions against all the people and governments involved. This is a relatively simple situation. In some cases you might deal with dozens of countries if someone spends time in and has connections to a lot of places and has assets and business interests around the world.

When these cases are filed the courts and the governments have a decision to make. Do they want to follow international law or do they want to commit crimes against humanity and have lifelong potential legal exposure under universal jurisdiction? If the government does not immediately concede in these cases then everyone involved is committing a crime against humanity. They can’t go to court and say that their crimes against humanity are somehow legal. That’s admitting guilt and continuing to perpetrate the crimes against humanity so they won’t do that unless they really want that legal exposure. The courts also have to immediately agree with you otherwise they’re in the same predicament. That doesn’t mean they will instantly fold because many of these people do not care about the potential consequences and feel that they are above the law.

The other factor is United Nations Security Council Resolution 2023 which condemns taxation crimes against humanity. The UN Security Council is basically the highest body in international law. If you go against it you can be sanctioned or worse. It is very rare for any country to openly defy the UN Security Council. If they defy the Council, they usually say in public that they are obeying it. Governments and courts could be getting in trouble with them, which they also might not want to do. There are also several high tax jurisdictions that have permanent seats on the council which always gives them a vote and veto power over any Council decisions that could go against them. If any of these countries refuses to comply with their own resolution, it could lead to them getting expelled from the council or inspire a ton of countries to refuse it’s authority (and maybe create their own council). This means that the US, UK, France along with the EU, Russia, and China will likely comply even if they don’t want to. They would be at risk of losing too much diplomatic power.

Another reason why success is likely, is because it can be politically dangerous to continue with Taxgate. Is Donald Trump going to brag to his Republican base that his IRS is worse than the Gestapo and that it’s really great that they won’t audit him? If he does that, then he definitely better hope the election is rigged. Will Gavin Newsom continue his shadow presidential campaign while he and his state government come under fire for crimes against humanity and disobeying the UN Security Council especially if cases are filed in federal and California state courts? Will Canadian politicians be able to brag about the similarities of their draconian tax system to the American one when there’s so much anti American sentiment in Canada right now? One thing that could boost separatists in Alberta and elsewhere is if Canada is committing crimes against humanity and disobeying the UN Security Council to steal more money from people. Taxgate can potentially bring down governments if they seek to continue it. You risk losing elections and give yourself lifetime potential crimes against humanity exposure. It’s total madness, which is why a surprisingly large amount of governments will do it, but there will be cracks in the wall and Taxgate will eventually tumble down.

Moral GPS, for a world where moral compasses aren’t enough, and kids can’t read a map. Not legal, financial, or any kind of advice. For entertainment purposes only.